dead British soldiers at the battle of Fromelles, 1916
you've heard me saying "whatever happens is perfect". here's why:
* in actuality (as something happens) global cause and effect cannot be undone.
* in actuality (as something occurs) global agent decisions cannot be undone.
* once something happens there are sufficient reasons for it to happen.
a) as per history:
* history is one big glunk (the whole history is one big history of little histories),
yet,
* history is not the summation of all events (since not all events are, or will be recorded in history),
* history is not in time, since time is not a bucket/container of anything,
* history is not the summation of all events (since not all events are, or will be recorded in history),
* history is not in time, since time is not a bucket/container of anything,
rather,
* time is a mode of being of reality: time is the becoming of reality.
* time is a mode of being of reality: time is the becoming of reality.
as a result,
* from the future we cannot cherry-pick globally (while ignoring local regions),
b) as per necessity:
* whatever happens necessarily happens (otherwise SOMETHING ELSE would happen),
* what happens supervenes on the agents contributing the diverse processes including the agents themselves,
c) we get a distorted view of the past through PRESENTISM:
* presentism is the distortion that the present is normatively better than the past,
* the past cannot be retrofitted into a principle of satisfaction: it is what it is,
* the past can only be understood as IT WAS, not as a subjunctive modality ("it should've been" this or that).
* to understand the past ONE HAS TO GO TO THE PAST, rather than bring the past to the present.
thanks,
* from the future we cannot cherry-pick globally (while ignoring local regions),
b) as per necessity:
* whatever happens necessarily happens (otherwise SOMETHING ELSE would happen),
* what happens supervenes on the agents contributing the diverse processes including the agents themselves,
c) we get a distorted view of the past through PRESENTISM:
* presentism is the distortion that the present is normatively better than the past,
* the past cannot be retrofitted into a principle of satisfaction: it is what it is,
* the past can only be understood as IT WAS, not as a subjunctive modality ("it should've been" this or that).
* to understand the past ONE HAS TO GO TO THE PAST, rather than bring the past to the present.
thanks,
No comments:
Post a Comment