What is the fundamental "stuff" (arche) of the universe?
The crucial feature of pre-Socratic philosophy was the use of reason to explain the universe. The philosophers shared the intuition that there was a single explanation that could explain both the plurality and the singularity of the whole. For some reason, they believed this fundamental stuff of the universe was univocal.
They called it archë.
MILESIAN SCHOOL (born in Miletus)
Anaximander (610-546 BC), a geometer and the first writer on philosophy. He came up with the idea of apeiron , i.e., an undefined, unlimited substance without qualities, out of which the primary opposites.
Thales of Miletus: (of the Milesian school) Thales claims that the world rests on water with the view that water is the archē or fundamental principle, and he adds that “that from which they come to be is a principle of all things.” He suggests that Thales chose water because of its fundamental role in coming-to-be, nutrition, and growth and claims that water is the origin of the nature of moist things. archë is water because, as a substance, it contains motion and change.
Heraclitus: Fuego. The universe is a state of perpetual flux, connected by logical structure or pattern, which he termed logos.
Xenophanes: comes up with the notion of pephuke (explanation), which states that X is really Y when Y reveals the true character of X.
Pythagoras: the notion that NUMBER (or mathematics) reveals the structure of the universe.
ELEATIC SCHOOL (born in Elea)
Parmenides is the father of metaphysics and rationalism. His theory is that what IS CANNOT NOT BE.
So, BEING (NOUS) is UNCHANGING. For something to change, it has to NOT BE, which is a contradiction because NOTHING cannot exist, and out of nothing, nothing comes.
Atomist School
The Atomists: Leucippus (5th BC) and his pupil Democritus of Abdera (460-370 BC) from Thrace. the arche are atoms: small primary bodies, infinite in number, indivisible and imperishable, qualitatively similar, but distinguished by their shapes. They move eternally through the infinite void. They collide and unite, thus generating objects that differ in accordance with the varieties in number, size, shape, etc. We are ALL atoms.
The Pluralist School
Empedocles: comes up with the principle of attraction and rejection, or LOVE and STRIFE. One cannot be without the other. Love unites, strife separates.
Observaciones:
Lo interesante es que las respuestas del archë se hacen cada vez más abstractas:
Tales → agua. Una cosa concreta.
Anaximandro → ápeiron. No es una cosa determinada, sino un principio indeterminado.
Pitágoras → número. El fundamento pasa de la materia a la estructura.
Heráclito → fuego / logos. El fundamento está en el devenir ordenado.
Parménides → ser: El fundamento ya no es material, sino ontológico.
Empédocles → cuatro raíces. No hay una sola sustancia originaria, sino varias irreductibles.
Atomistas → átomos + vacío. La multiplicidad se explica mediante unidades materiales y el espacio que permite su movimiento.
No todos estos presocráticos usan arché en el mismo sentido. En Tales y Anaximandro, la palabra funciona muy bien; en Pitágoras, Heráclito y Parménides, ya estamos ante principios filosóficos más complejos. En
