Friday, April 27, 2018
Review for Final Exam (open to all classes)
You already know hoe important it is to get a help from a SA. Well, Rohama Bruk (T,R 11:15am class) will be at the Learning Spot, next Tuesday May 1st, from 2-5pm reviewing paper assignments.
In addition she is conducting a final review on Wednesday, May 2nd, from 11-12:30pm, at the same place. Don't miss it.
Thank you Rohanna!
In addition she is conducting a final review on Wednesday, May 2nd, from 11-12:30pm, at the same place. Don't miss it.
Thank you Rohanna!
Wednesday, April 25, 2018
Monday, April 23, 2018
Thursday, April 19, 2018
Wednesday, April 18, 2018
final exam schedule (all classes)
honors 10am, may 2
honors 11am, may 4
honors, interamerican, may 2
t,r 8:25am, may 3
t,r 11:15am, may 3
t 5:40pm, may 1
honors 11am, may 4
honors, interamerican, may 2
t,r 8:25am, may 3
t,r 11:15am, may 3
t 5:40pm, may 1
Tuesday, April 17, 2018
Sunday, April 15, 2018
Friday, April 13, 2018
my notes to 5.1 and 5.2
click here to find my counter to cultural relativism, (with a little help from abstract algebra)
click here to find some notes to section 5.2,
click here to find some notes to section 5.2,
Thursday, April 12, 2018
Monday, April 9, 2018
Tuesday, April 3, 2018
Monday, April 2, 2018
Wednesday, March 28, 2018
I'm the best! (and you too)
I'm a self-centered pluralist. It means I'm the best.
I'm also an ethnocentric pluralist. It means my people (Lebanese, and more particularly Maronite Lebanese) are the best.
Now, very important: My being the best does not exclude many other bests.
Here's the definition for "best" from the dictionary: One that surpasses all others.
Ok, now "surpasses all others" needs to be qualified.
In what respect I surpass all others?
I surpass all others precisely in my being this particular individual that I am. All the notes that make me myself.
Say, temporal notes (about the time I've lived so far), character notes (character is the set of all consensual behaviors of witnesses about me), psychological notes (memories, desires, hopes, etc),
physical notes (gender, sex, race, endurance, etc), behavioral notes (what I do in the world), skill notes (what I'm good at), etc. You get the idea.
The same with you, with similar results.
Suppose you retort: well, you're not a better cook than Daniel Boulud, are you? So how could you be best? I'm not saying being best chef, nor the best French chef, which means being best in all possible French-chef notes. Boulud (whom I admire) is the best French chef I know, but not the best Chinese chef, nor the best Mexican Chef, and so on.
Best is not an unqualified universal category.
Say, temporal notes (about the time I've lived so far), character notes (character is the set of all consensual behaviors of witnesses about me), psychological notes (memories, desires, hopes, etc),
physical notes (gender, sex, race, endurance, etc), behavioral notes (what I do in the world), skill notes (what I'm good at), etc. You get the idea.
The same with you, with similar results.
Suppose you retort: well, you're not a better cook than Daniel Boulud, are you? So how could you be best? I'm not saying being best chef, nor the best French chef, which means being best in all possible French-chef notes. Boulud (whom I admire) is the best French chef I know, but not the best Chinese chef, nor the best Mexican Chef, and so on.
Best is not an unqualified universal category.
"Best" is more a regional category, otherwise there's no way to even know what's best. As when I say:
"John (my mechanic) this is the best SAAB mechanic in Coral Gables." I don't doubt there are better mechanics than John in Miami.
"Best" is function of all the notes that make a respective particular.
f(ni) = p
Why is this good? Because without a balanced sense of SELF & community one is more prone to be dispossessed.
"Best" is function of all the notes that make a respective particular.
f(ni) = p
Why is this good? Because without a balanced sense of SELF & community one is more prone to be dispossessed.
Tuesday, March 27, 2018
(psychological duplication) DID and how to treat it
DID and how to treat it, from Psychology Today.
A good movie dealing with duplication: Identity, 2003. Click here for the trailer.
A good movie dealing with duplication: Identity, 2003. Click here for the trailer.
Saturday, March 24, 2018
Thursday, March 22, 2018
Wednesday, March 21, 2018
professor ed frenkel discusses professor langland's contributions to mathematics
i know that some of the stuff we do in class is "out-there" and sometimes you resist it. well, here is a great russian mathematician, ed frenkel, from UC Berkley talking about professor langland's contributions to mathematics. check 7:30, when frenken presents the question: if there are aliens, would they use the same mathematics we use? or 10:48, where he hypothesizes how numbers are tied to our practical human tasks (supposing aliens had tasks). this is a great lecture for all of you, not only math enthusiasts! here is professor frenkel's personal website.
Tuesday, March 20, 2018
the "nobel" prize in mathematics goes to...
(there's no Nobel for math, but the Abel Prize is kind of a Nobel). in any case, the winner is Professor Robert Langlands, from Princeton, (I would've given anything to be his student). Read this Langland's interview.
also, we have the biggest prime so far: 274,207,281 − 1
a propos of primes (the bread and butter of number theory), three students of my 2016 honors class approached me with this question: are there infinite more prime numbers than composite numbers?
Find my sketched proof here.
also, we have the biggest prime so far: 274,207,281 − 1
a propos of primes (the bread and butter of number theory), three students of my 2016 honors class approached me with this question: are there infinite more prime numbers than composite numbers?
Find my sketched proof here.
section 4.2 memory theory
how memories work? (scientific american)
so we have fake memories (apparent in our jargon)
why are some memories memorable? (scientific american)
so we have fake memories (apparent in our jargon)
why are some memories memorable? (scientific american)


