branches of philosophy in daily conversation

the art of philosophy is about propositions. here you have some examples:

eipstemology in daily conversation (how much we know)

 
"I know what I'm saying", (what does he/she means?) 
" Jay is not a good person", (1. is he not, really? and 2. what sort of criteria are they using?)
"People in the 1800s thought that____", (how they know?, historic research?, hearsay?, opinions?)
"I hate math", (are you sure? do you hate it or is it more that you afraid of it?)
"I want to be a nurse", (are you a nurse cause you want to or because, say, your parents want you to and you don't want to disappoint them? what about a dear friend that is a nurse and you wish to be like her?)

logic in daily conversation (whether our thinking process is correct)

"Jay has covid symptoms, so I'm Jay has covid" (can a person have symptoms and not have the disease?)
"If it rains the streets are wet; the streets are wet, so it must have rained" (do you see why this is not true? we call it a fallacy). 

"If you don't love me then you hate me" (are there not other possibilities?)

ethics in daily conversation (what's right and wrong)

"John is a bad person", (what makes a bad person for you? quick perceptions about the person, vibes, behavior? and if so, how do you objectively analyze this?)
"Alice has a bad character", (what is character? & what makes Alice's character "bad"?)

aesthetics in daily conversation (issues of taste and subjectivity)

"I love this car", (is this an assumption or a good observation?)

"Wow, you look hot", (why? emotions and reasons are not the same )

"This is the best chicken soup I've tasted so far", (is this true or is it a hyperbole? and suppose someone asks why? is he/she prepared to explain it?) 

metaphysics in daily conversation (ascertain the thing we refer to)

"The love I felt for you was not really love, it was more like infatuation", (the person being told this proposition needs an urgent definition of the distinction between the two, don't you think?) 

defending selfcentric pluralism

click here for more information,

here's the power of philosophy in a few charts (GMAT, LSAT, and GRE scores) including $alary!

Above is the Graduate Management Admission Test, a computer adaptive test intended to assess analytical, writing, quantitative, verbal, and reading skills in written English for use in admission to a graduate management program, such as MBA programs. This is sort of your MBA "bread and butter."

Above you have the results for the LSAT (entrance to Law School). Look at Philosophy with the arrow.  It has the highest Mean High (159.47) and Median High (160).

Computing the Average LSAT shows Philosophy in Number 1! 

Above are the GRE Verbal scores measure the ability to read and interpret. It includes both spoken and written communication. Very important in pursuing careers in all the Humanities & journalism. Also very important for interpersonal skills in management positions.

GRE Analytical, is essential for many different types of jobs in a variety of fields, including Business Analytics, Data Architecture, Data Sciences, Marketing, Project Management, Accounting, Business Development, Programming, Law, Medicine, and all the sciences.

Quantitative reasoning is the application of basic mathematics skills, such as arithmetic, algebra, geometry, etc, to the analysis and interpretation of real-world quantitative information in the context of any discipline.

GRE composite score is determined by combining your total scores for Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning, each scored on a scale of 130-170. GRE composite scores are important for graduate or business school admission and an aspect of your application admission officers weigh with great consideration.

How about salary?

Not bad.

what do you gain with this class?