Wednesday, August 24, 2011

M,W,F 9am class

40 comments:

katherine_toruno said...

Muammar Gaddafi born June 7, 1942 who ruled Libyan from 1969-2011 after seizing power in a military coup, Gaddafi abolished the Libyan Constitution of 1951. After Gaddafi seizes power Gaddafi proceeded to eliminate any opposition and severely restricted lives of Libyans. Gaddafi and his relatives took over much of the economy where the gas and the oil had been diverted to him and his family. Most of the Libyan people where not benefit from the nature resources that country has. On February 2011 a movement demonstrated against Gaddafi spreader across the country. Gaddafi respond by dispatching the military and plainclothes armed men on the streets to attack demonstrator; however many switched sides.
Gaddafi went into a civil war with movement where Nato Coalition bomb Gaddafi troops and supporters in Tripoli on August 23, 2011 Gaddafi lost control where the rebels capture his own compound. In my opinion Gaddafi and any dictator ship must remove from power for not having the will of the people for freedom and dignity of the country. After four years in power humans intend to have lost the contact with reality and the need of the people. After all these years Gaddafi and his relatives thought there are running a farm not a country. That’s what makes the people rebel against the ruler.

Andrew Davis said...

Muammar Gaddafi caused a great deal of hardship and suffering for the citizens of Libya. He executed many dissidents during the early stages of his coup d’etat, and his regime’s fiscal policies have harmed many formerly prosperous regions of the country. According to the Economist, Libya’s eastern slice has been ruined my Gaddafi’s “eccentric economic theories.” In light of these circumstances, I understand and can sympathize with the revolution in Libya. The protestors were at first peaceful in their method of complaint, but were met with harsh military action from Gaddafi. There can be no surprise that such suppression would be met with a revolt from the Libyan people. When there exist many countries that have freedom of speech and freedom to protest, etc., it is only natural that the people of a country lacking these freedoms would want them. Would we as Americans not fight and rebel for our freedoms? Didn’t we? As to the success of this specific revolt, Mansour O. El-Kikhia is correct when he says that the National Transitional Council will have to set certain goals, like electing a legislative body that can then set up a new constitution. If this happens, I believe that the revolution has a good chance of success.

Anonymous said...

While most people hear the name Gaddafi and automatically recognize who and what this man is, it is hard for me to admit that I did not know about this individual until this revolution began. Since this unique event took place, I have become more familiar with its events but I strongly feel that unless I am actually there I can never fully understand what this means for the Libyan people. Like all revolutions, this began as a rebel against the norm. Gaddafi ruled with a overly strong hand and caused a great deal of hardship in his people for nothing more than the fact he could. He never stopped to think how his actions would affect the people, he simply wanted to control every aspect of the country. While the more recognized revolutions have yielded positive results, one can never know the certainty of the future and what it holds for the people of Libya. I believe this revolution will help the people, if only to make them see that they do have the power and the means to make their country an amazing place for them to live, free of any tyrant who would want to enslave them in a lifestyle that is against all moral human dignities.
-Veronica Cotera

Keyree Castano said...

Despite Gaddafi's violent attempts to control the protesters, they have proven themselves a resilient force to be reckoned with. Although, Qaddafi is not one to give up so easily “Historically, he is a man of his word” and if he claims he will stay and fight at the risk of civil war, then such is likely to be the case; however, the protestors will not make his quest an easy task. People are dying while they are defending their rights, how many people have been kill and disappear throughout this years? people just want to live like a normal humans being, they are tired that every time one of their family member go out they don’t know if they are going to come back alive or not! and that will not stop until Gaddafi is out .After 42 years of power he has long resisted outside powers,but his time has come .whether he wants to accept it or not, his days are numbered as a new dawn for Libya is about to begin.

Keyree Castano

geovis18 said...

Everybody should know that a powerful person such as the Rulers will always have people for and against; in these cases, power is dangerous when it is not directed in favor of the society. The most of the cases, rulers` greed leads them to use the power in their own benefit, and here is when the society complains; if the country`s economy grows and its members` economy is the same or worst so they start protesting against the government in different ways.
In Libya case, I can notice something wrong in the political system just knowing that its ruler Gadafi has been in the power for 40 years; changes should exist in order to prevent the dictatorship (the power accumulation in one person), because a person who knows that he/she has a big control in a society feels the confidence to make whatever he/she wants with this.
In my opinion, this revolution had to have started long years ago, however; there is a saying “the valiant lives until the coward wants” and the Lebanese got tired of the tyranny; it is truth that the revolution affects to other countries because Libya is an important supplier of oil, but the Lebanese have the right of fight for its liberty and for a better quality of life.
GEOVANA VAZQUEZ

Jesus Tamayo said...

I believe that there is hope for the Libyan revolution. The fact that the revolution has been successful so far is a big clue on what is to come. The corrupted leader himself has chosen to hide from the revolutionary forces, something that can be seen as another victory for the revolutionary forces. Even if lives have been lost during the revolution those lives will not be going to waste. After all it is by the means of destruction that one can rebuild what was lost. My one and only true concern is the hard times that await Libya. The rebuilding processes of Libya’s government and society posses as a difficult task do to not all of the population agreeing with the revolution. Coming to terms and agreeing on what the new Libya will be should be more than difficult when the population is divided among their beliefs. Change is not something that occurs in a blink of an eye not to mention the steps that will need to be taken to make sure another revolution is never needed again.

Maria Castellanos said...

Gaddafi ruled Lybia for 40 years, during this years Lybia became a country where there was a lot of descrimination, explotation and went through a really hard economic situation. Gaddafi made all the citizens of Lybia suffer because of the lack of freedom, all the citizens felt opressed . He took advantage of all the benefits of the country and took over the economy. He became a disputed ruler and abolished the Lybian Constitution of 1951 and adopted his own laws based on potilical ideology.. After gadaffi sized power he proceeded to eliminate any opposition and severely restricted lives of ordinary Libyans. Gadaffi started several wars and spent his time acquiring chemical and nuclear weapons. After all Gaddafi did to the country of Lybia he escaped and now the citizens are protesting like they have been doing for years. Now that he is not the ruler of Lybia anymore I believe there is hope for this nation, everything can change and economy can be better, the citizens can choose someone better to tun the country and change it all around.

Cristhiam Espinales said...

A revolution is tragically tainted by arms, and the dominantly nonviolent revolts across the region. The sacrifice in terms of people killed in Libya is significantly higher than that of the ongoing revolutions elsewhere in the region. After the succes of the Libyan revolution is going to be hard for the country to stablish their economy and recover from all the damage. There should´nt be dictators in the world.

Anonymous said...

Everyone should have known that Libya would turn into the way it is today under Gaddafi‘s power. He has been the Ruler of this country for over 40 years and he never change the way he has been ruling this country. He should have known this is not the same generation things and people change a lot so he should either update his political views or let someone else be the Libyan leader.
By that I think we all can learn a lesson, us, man all we care about is power over everything. If he really cared for his country he should have been done what the Libyan people had been asking him. He should know he spent enough time as those Libyans leader. He’s trying everything in his power to shut those people down but he should understand that they want change.He caused everything that's happening.Therefore he should give them what they want. Luckily Libya is a small country with a lot of fortunes like oils. But with this war going on not only it’s affecting the Libyans but it’s also affecting the world.
Lukagea S.

Chris Craven said...

Muammar Gaddafi was a horrid leader, eliminating protesters that did not agree with his policies and his actions that spurred the military coup d’etat. He stripped the Libyan people of a well-oiled economy; making decisions that have only ruined businesses throughout the country. The Libyan Revolution was spurred by conflicts that originally began in Tunisia and is an integral part of the “Arab Spring.” It has provided Libya’s people with a chance at freedoms that were cheated from them by Muammar Gaddafi. The corrupt government has a chance to transition into a modernized democracy that resembles Westernized forms of government. The United States supports the Libyan liberation, which only gives the revolt a higher rate of success. Yes, the revolution has transitioned from a peaceful protest to a civil war, but the Libyan people are only attempting to seize what is rightfully theirs – civil and social liberties. As Americans, we must not take these rights for granted, and support the Libyan people in their quest for democracy.

Chris Craven said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Chris Craven said...

Muammar Gaddafi was a horrid leader, eliminating protesters that did not agree with his policies and his actions that spurred the military coup d’etat. He stripped the Libyan people of a well-oiled economy; making decisions that have only ruined businesses throughout the country. The Libyan Revolution was spurred by conflicts that originally began in Tunisia and is an integral part of the “Arab Spring.” It has provided Libya’s people with a chance at freedoms that were cheated from them by Muammar Gaddafi. The corrupt government has a chance to transition into a modernized democracy that resembles Westernized forms of government. Yes, the revolution has transitioned from a peaceful protest to a civil war, but the Libyan people are only attempting to seize what is rightfully theirs – civil and social liberties. As Americans, we must not take these rights for granted, and support the Libyan people in their quest for democracy. I believe that the Libyan Revolution will be a successful one as long as the Transitional Council can make balanced decisions that benefit Libya as a whole.

julio reconco said...

It is true that the outcome of most revolutions that have transpired have not delivered the promising changes that people expected and hoped for; in past revolutions a group or individual has taken advantage of the needs of a new regime, like in most cases in Latin American Revolutions, once in power the government turns these changes in their favor to gain absolute control of the country and its habitants. The Libyans revolted against a government that had oppressed then for decades, perhaps this is the key factor that is leading them through this transition of power, in which “atrocities that usually accompany such changes” have not been witnessed; there are risking their lives not to destroy the foundations of their society but to create a structure for future generations, looting and destroying is not part of reconstructing a society. Looking at the way this transition is coming along one can conclude that changes are coming for the better; however, the hardest is yet to come for this revolution,for the new regime will have to satisfy the needs of many avoiding the mistakes of the past.

Anonymous said...

What’s next for the Libyan people after this highly publicized revolution? While many people optimistically view the revolt in Libya as a step in the direction of democracy in a region largely ruled by dictatorships, Libya is bound to face a difficult and perhaps long period of adjustment. The rebels in Libya lack organization, and the reliability of the rebel leaders awaits to be proven. In the past, changes in power have not necessarily led to a better situation for the people; view Cuba after Fidel Castro’s overthrow of the Batista regime in 1959, after five years of struggle. One dictator was overthrown only to have another replace him, and a similar situation in Chile after a US backed coup d’etat overthrew the democratically elected socialist Salvador Allende, resulting in a military dictatorship headed by Augusto Pinochet that, from 1973 until its dissolution in 1990, was guilty of numerous crimes against humanity. While those cases could be observed as isolated and completely separate cases from Libya, it is necessary to go back and reflect upon other such revolutions to truly weigh what the outcome for the citizens of Libya could be. If outside sources intervene, such as the US, could it truly be considered an organic and homegrown revolution? How well would the rebels have fared had NATO not provided support from the air? How well can one expect rebels who have no education in politics or experience to head a new Libyan government, aside from impassioned ideas and perhaps convoluted morals? There is still much to wait and see in the development and perhaps imminent conclusion of the Libyan revolution.

-Susan Guerra

dessin17 said...

Next in importance to freedom and justice is popular education, without which neither freedom nor justice can be permanently maintained."(James A. Garfield)" i feel that the people libya revolution can done and justified. now they have a chance to rebuild there system and have a better future and not let past come to them again. by: Yves Dessin

Madeline H. said...

To understand this "unique event" one must first understand or define the word revolution. In a general point of view, a revolution is an act that not only brings about regime change but also a fundamental social, economic and/or cultural change. A transformation in hopes of bettering an organizational structure. With that being said I highly agree with the revolting of the Libyans because they wanted a change. During Gaddafi's 42 years of power he eliminated any opposition, and severely restricted lives of ordinary Libyans. As a leader Gaddafi's job was to govern his people by creating a democratic government, but his communistic political ideology empowered the country, which lead to enraged civilians.

The libyans wanted change and did something about it. They came together as a people to fight for what they believe is right, not knowing the outcome. For that reason I concluded that the libyans are a very strong group, who exercised their right to freedom of speech. Though I cannot predict the future and plan the faith of the Libyan people I can say that they do have a long road ahead when it comes to adjusting to the new state of the country and creating a regime.
-Madeline Henry

catalina quintero said...

The Libyan civil war is an important event, the armed conflict in the North African being fought between forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi and his regime and those seeking to depose him. The situation began as a series of peaceful protests which were met with military force by the Gaddafi regime. I think that this unique event is an important change to Libya having some many damages to the country in the economic part and also all the people killed. It’s great in my opinion that in this case people have rights to express their opinions and fight for their freedom. The revolution in Libya is aflame, and has achieved considerable success, internally and internationally. Libyans waited for the moment of true inspiration, and now that it has come and the time is right, they have achieved their goal, with a courage and motivation that has astonished the world. I think that the hope of the people in Libya is the Gaddafi’s capture, so they can recover for all the revolution having human rights and a new president that help them to build a new Libya.

Anonymous said...

Andres Garcia
11am -11:50am
Intro to philosophy

As far as the Libyan revolution we cant say it will all work out if we look closer to home before the Castro regime took over their was Batista and the Cuban revolution just exchanged one tyrant for another. Can we really call it a revolution? The blood shed just continues while the people continue to fear the government nothing good will come of it. The Economy will suffer from corruption and injustices and the fact that their leaders are procrastinating in setting up the government doesn’t help the situation. While the rebels are busy chasing after the old regime we see the new government struggle with water shortages around the country. Libya seems like another Iraq or Afghanistan where the government isn’t much help and rely on American troops. The rebels also rely on NATO to take out Gadhafi military targets and claim that its for the protection of Libyan citizens.

Anonymous said...

Clearly, Libya is in need of a revolution and they are not alone. It really does hurt me to see people who can't even talk out loud about their ideas and views on society because apparently the police start inquiring about them, burning down houses, documents, or whatever it may be. The philosopher president, Thomas Jefferson, once said, "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." The people of Libya need a revolution and they should fight it until the very end. Are they not tired of living the way they have for the past forty years? Dictatorships are solely the most selfish and disgusting forms of government I can even think of, its all just a lust for power.

Anonymous said...

Clearly, Libya is in need of a revolution and they are not alone. It really does hurt me to see people who can't even talk out loud about their ideas and views on society because apparently the police start inquiring about them, burning down houses, documents, or whatever it may be. The philosopher president, Thomas Jefferson, once said, "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty." The people of Libya need a revolution and they should fight it until the very end. Are they not tired of living the way they have for the past forty years? Dictatorships are solely the most selfish and disgusting forms of government I can even think of, its all just a lust for power.

-Roberto Siriani

Anonymous said...

Libya is a country in the Maghreb region of North Africa. Muammar Gaddafi became the leader of the country on September 1, 1969. Gaddafi has been ruling the country of Libya for 42 years. During the 1980s and 1990s, Gaddafi openly supported international terrorism, which led to a decline of Libya's foreign relations, ending in the US bombing of Libya in 1986. Gaddafi and his relatives took over much of country economy. Most of the business enterprise has been controlled by Gaddafi and his family. Gaddafi's relatives assumed lavish lifestyles, including luxurious homes, Hollywood film investments and private parties with famous American music stars, while a large part of Libya’s population lives in poverty. He directed the country's incomes to sponsor terror and other political activities around the world. The people of Libya is tired of being oppress by Gaddafi’s administration, so on February 17,2011 major political protests began in Libya against Gaddafi's government. Gaddafi's reign of power ends on August 23, 2011. I think the revolution in Libya was much needed because the people of Libya have suffered greatly at the hand of Gaddafi and his regime. It’s time for a change. Libya needs a leader that will put the want and welfare of the people first. I believe that there is hope for the Libyan revolution. In mythology, a phoenix is an immortal bird that, when it dies, bursts into flames and from those ashes, a fledgling phoenix rises – renewed and reborn. I believe like the phoenix Libya will rises and will be reborn into a great nation.

-Ramondina Jean Joseph

Anonymous said...

The Libyan people were upset and fed up with the Libyan government so the only way that they seem that they can express themselves was to stand up for them as a country and a revolution started. The Libyan revolution needn’t end in civil war. At the same time, there’s no guarantee that it won’t. Either way, our ability to influence the course of events is limited; Gaddafi who had power for many years oppressed the Libyan people in many ways. On September 1, 1969, a small group of military officers led by Gaddafi staged a coup d’état against king Idris, launching the Libyan revolution. The only way to make things better is to take all the government officials that had anything to do with this kick them out of power. As Libya continues on its path toward a newly reborn nation, and the profound complication of state building begins, Libyans will face another, less visible hurdle; reconciling those deep-seated societal scars resulting from more than 40 years of oppression and fear.
Tania Joseph

Anonymous said...

A social revolution always opens the possibility to changes, but also the possibility of a civil conflict. Tired of an oppressive regime established since 1969, Libyans are not just facing the possibility of an endless conflict emerging from rebels against fractions of the population still supporting the dictatorial government of Gaddafi; for instance, Colombia having a constitutional government has endured an armed conflict since 1948 between the socialist guerrillas and the established government. Libyans also faced a social rehabilitation transitioning from a country with no constitution, which was abolished in 1951, no legally established institutions, besides those created for Gaddafi’s inner circle, and no housing or infrastructure for over 40 years. What started as an open protest in February, 2011 following the uprising in Tunisia and Egypt, has become and ongoing situation that has left thousands of casualties, the country’s division and no near conclusion, either the capture or surrender of Muammar Gaddafi. The recent victory of the rebels leaves the world expecting for a country’s evolution with a population eager to exercise a much waited freedom and rights.
-Bibiana Ramos-

Anonymous said...

Libya’s Revolution has become the center of attention for many countries that really care about democracy, human rights and liberty. Many Revolutions have turned to be worse than the previous regime, that’s the case I believe of the first Libyan Revolution back on September 1969, when Muammar Gaddafi made himself Leader of the country. During almost 42 years Libya remained bleeding and struggling under a Tyrannical Government. It wasn’t until now that Libyans decided to stop the oppressor and drastically change their country. Fortunately the rebellion attracted the world’s attention and made all this democratic and free countries aware of the danger Gaddafi represented and of the help Libya needed. Libya was supported by the United Nations and now is their chance to decide the fate of their own country. In this second Libyan Revolution I hope nothing but to see a country changed, from being exploited to be free.
-Armas, Randy-

Raul Ramirez said...

Muammar Gaddafi was de facto autocratic ruler of Libya from 1969 to 2011, after he seized power on military coup. As a result of the 2011 Libyan civil war and the creation of the national transitional council and that’s why he has become a disrupted leader. He abolished the Libyan constitution of 1951 and adopted laws based on his own political views and ideals. His 42 years in power make him the fourth longest running non royal leader since 1900, and as well as the longest running Arab leader. I believe that there is hope for this revolution but it’s really far off because not everybody will have the same ideals and like Shadi Hamid, says Libya does not have resources and benefits to have political parties like Egypt does so it’s going to be hard, but with time I think they can do it and maybe even have peace at last some near future from now.

bethmarie89 said...

Muammar Gaddafi has ruled the people of Lybia for 42 years. The majority of the participants in the revolt against his regime have never known another government. Their idealism and ability to imagine a better ruler for their country is absolutely inspiring. Gaddafi has tried to frighten the people of Lybia to deter them from the mission to oust him; he has murdered and injured many innocent people despite the incredibly peaceful nature of the Lybian revolution. His efforts have been largely unsuccessful; the determination of the people is stronger than Gaddafi.
Now the question is how will Lybia rebuild? Though he has been forced out of office Gaddafi still has many supporters. Many of his supporters live in the more rural parts of Libya. I recently heard a report that the capital, Tripoli, is facing a water shortage because the areas in control of the water pumps still support Gaddafi. There are many barriers the people of Lybia must overcome if they are to build a successful government, but I believe their determination over the past months has shown they are capable of doing so.

-Elizabeth Brady

Karen Domond said...

“When you are coming out of a situation like this, the wrong thing to do is to eliminate everything that exists and start from scratch.” Instead, Kaboub says the country needs to refocus on its core industries, like tourism—a sector that has suffered during the turmoil—and technology. I agree with this statement said by Kaboub because if you want a new beginning you have to start from scratch. I think the revolution within the country could be changed and made better; however, it will take some time. For a new change to take place everyone has to collaborate with one solution in mind. Joining the system without adopting the mentality of the system might be slower. It will be a long, labor-intensive process requiring all the hallmarks of a free and democratic society: a vigilant press, civic engagement, and—finally, gloriously—freedom of speech. Revolution could be bloody and even if won could lead to another dictatorship.

Alberto Jack said...

We are living a very interesting time in history, with a lot of different countries going through tumultuous times. Lybia is just the latest to have taken all this tension formed by having a dictator in power for an extended period of time and do something to change their situation.
I believe that one of the main reasons why these revolutions are happening around the world is because people now are much more connected with the rest of the world. Because of globalization these people now realize what the alternatives to these injustices are.
I strongly support the efforts of these “rebels” in Lybia because I believe that almost any alternative will be better than to have the same ruler for 40 years. I also agree with Mansour O. El-Kikhia in that the best thing that could happen is for the rebels to hurry and form a more stable, fairer government.
Alberto Jack

Anonymous said...

Noel Alerte
Muammar Gaddafi should step down from the government in Libya without the intervention of any other country. Gaddafi has led the people in Libya for more than forty years. He had complete control over them for all that years. Gaddafi used his tactics to manipulate the people in Libya and to make them believe in him. If for any reasons whatsoever now the people in Libya demand Gaddafi to resign, he had to do so in a peaceful manner. It appears Gaddafi forgets how he took power in Libya. The Bible says that whosoever kills by flesh, will also be killed by the same flesh. This is what happens to Gaddafi right now. Gaddafi took power in Libya in 1969 by a military coup. This revolution caused life hundreds of people, and it also caused thousands of people to leave Libya. Why it seems difficult for Gaddafi to step down? Gaddafi and his family enrich themselves with the wealth in Libya for more than forty years, and mostly every one of his family played a key role in his government and what else do they need? Gaddafi needs to understand that the country of Libya does not belong to one particular family. It belongs to all Libyan people. Bravo to Libyan people who feels the spirit of democracy after forty two years under dictatorial regime; however, they need to be careful on the choice they will make on the days ahead.

Anonymous said...

Many have appealed to the masses that right now we are witnessing history. We are active and aware of the revolution that is happening in Libya. But there is a question of asking is what we are witnessing really right? Do we really have all of the facts to form a basic opinion about what is happening in Libya?
This isn't your usual history class in which you are presented with as many facts as possible, and you are able to analyze the sentiments that were felt within that time period. We are the sentiments within that time period. I think it would help for many of us to take a step back, and think about the revolution that is occuring not from a biased standpoint. Now of course you can't be as informed as many will be 10 years from now about the regime and the rebels, but it can only help to learn more about it. I think the long term effects of the fall of the Gaddafi regime will be brutal and harsh. But I don't think the long-term causes that forced the United Nations and the US to act so swiftly will ever be fully shown to the american people.
Many times when we are witnessing history, we forget to stop analyzing it in terms of what the CNN reporter is saying, and the propaganda that is presented to us. I only hope for the best for Libyan people, but I can't say that I foresee them having a great future. Especially with the amount of western influence that will be pouring in because of their new-found "democracy".

Angelica Louis-Jeune

Anonymous said...

The Libyan revolution is of paramount significance, considering the Egyptian revolution which preceded it, and the implications of these two successive revolutions in North Africa. The overthrow of two authoritarian regimes could very well result in similar rebellions in other authoritarian, Islamic fundamentalist states, such as Syria. The Libyan people’s rise against the Libyan regime and its loyalists is truly courageous and inspiring. If Gaddafi’s proclamation of, “Let Libya be engulfed in flames,” does not prove how unfit he was for leadership, his support of terrorist organizations, and his crimes against humanity as defined in Article 7 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court certainly does.
Now that rebel forces have taken over Gaddafi’s compound, and the physical toppling of the regime is nearly finished, new obstacles present themselves to the Libyan people. The establishment of a new, democratic government is crucial to the state’s well being; however such an act will be difficult in a nation with no previously established political parties.
-Alicia Cruz

Michael Harrington said...

Muammar Gaddafi ran an authoritarian regime, not allowing citizens to disagree with his policies. He initiated the military coup d’état. He deprived the Libyans of an efficient economy, making adverse decisions for the country's businesses. The Libyan Revolution was prompted by turmoil that started in Tunisia. The revolutionary movement has allowed Libyans a chance to achieve freedoms that were denied by their corrupt leader, Muammar Gaddafi. The current system has the capacity to shift to a Western modernized democracy. The United States supports the liberation front, which means the possibility of its success is much higher. The revolution has become a civil war, but the people are only trying to gain their inalienable rights. I comprehend and side with the revolution in Libya. The protestors attempted nonviolence, but expectantly revolted firmly when met by Gaddafi's coarse military action. The National Transitional Council will have to establish ambitions, such as the fair and equal election of a legislature that can form a constitution. If this successfully occurs, then the revolution has a favorable probability of winning the battle.

Anonymous said...

It is quite simple for someone to dictate and control, as Muammar Gaddafi did for forty-two years but it is not so simple to take a ruler with such power out of control. There is an ongoing war between a nation with hopes for freedom and a brighter future and those forces that are demoralized and loyal to Gaddafi. Innocent civilians die brutal deaths, and suffer throughout their daily lives for no cause but for the selfishness of one man and his family. As they say “Karma kills” and Gaddafi will soon get a taste of his own medicine, if he is not already. The people of Libya have fought; lost blood, sweat and tears but I believe if people have faith and continue to defend their rights, then a new day will come. Adapting to change is a difficult task and if done correctly Libyans can overcome oppressed decades. Corruption, injustices, and poverty will overwhelm the economy but the government needs to concentrate on the safety and welfare of the people. I believe if someone is determined enough to do what it takes to get the job done then they will be successful. If the people of Libya come together and work hard enough to better their country, then those better days will come in time.

Krystal Gonzalez

Anonymous said...

The Libyan Revolution

What happens when people are pushed to their limit? Were seeing the answer in the Arab world. There is power in numbers and when people come together to defend their rights and beliefs, dictators beware. Where there is a will, there is a way. When people are wiling to risk their lives for a movement such as overthrowing the government, they will succeed; but revolutions have failed in past to bring happiness to the majority, and sometimes breed a new dictator in spite of those making the ultimate sacrifice. If the revolution succeeds the people must make sure they create the right democratic institutions to secure their rights and provide for the common good. Their is hope for Libya, where you see students and professionals in the street, supported by Europe, and United States, who dream and are willing to die for a brighter future, free from their soon to be overthrown dictator and of the Islamist threat that looms in their future.

Xabier Martinez-Cid

joevanih sauvagere said...

Joevanih Sauvagere said......
Muammar Gaddafi caused a great deal of hardship and suffering for the citizens of Liby revolution can be change. The economic need to be fix so the fundamental social to increasing. Their cultural change have to go back in their own way, because their state power are struggle. The state have a lot in their mind, such as they have issues of sociological. Also their political are not organize in their state. The people was so savage, and it was no control because they was mad. They have no right in their state, and they are fighting for their right. The Liby Revolution is a right move but their government need to change. After 42 years of power from Muammar Gaddafi long resisted outside powers, but his time has come. It is still much to see and i hope their state overcome their problems.

Michael Lawrence said...

The Libyan Revolution was a progressive movement in order to create a much better living establishment for Libyans. The revolt, led by the young adults, is a sign that people are knowledgeable about how Mummar Gaddafi was a despotic ruler and spent the money meant for the inhabitants of Libya without concern for the needy. I believe the revolt is a good thing. To overthrow a tyrant has been the dream of scores of oppressed people throughout the ages. However, I do believe the freedom fighters were very lucky to actually win against such an adversary. If Gaddafi was not as arrogant and considered the revolt a threat and took the necessary precautions, it all might have turned out differently. I just hope the revolt was for the better and the situation improves rather than worsens. If the new comer does not make the appropriate changes, the vicious cycle might begin again.

Reniel Castaneira said...

The history of Libya reveals the real face of an oppressed, submissive society which after many years of continuous regression has decided to take action, and finally stand for their rights. I admire their unity, vision, and willingness to fight for their country which entails not only their present, but also the future of loved ones.
Libya has taken a step feared by many other nations. This becomes more evident when we investigate why people immigrate to foreign countries. An afflicted citizen could reveal against his ruler, but it is the support of an afflicted nation what can really cause change.
When such support is absent, afflicted citizens may either die or forced to leave their countries in search of freedom, better standard of living, and opportunities. I strongly support the Libyan Revolution, and I am confident these people will value their rights even more than those who take them for granted.

Reniel Castaneira

Grisell Gonzalez said...

This is a very intesristing article. Specially now that this topic about Lybia is coming out in the news a lot. Personally I believe revolutions will never work, due to the fact that a person can't be in power for such a long time. Lybia's ex-resident for instance, after 42 years in power we can all see all the damage is has caused the country. Now even after Gadafi left the presidency it will take the country years to recover. Revolutions can only end when the country rebels againts the government, unfortunnaly there's no easy way around it. the rebels in Lybia for instance, if it wouldn't have been for them Lybia would still be under Gadafi's government. Also, under his power many infractions were happenig, starting with the fact that most of his cabinet was form with his family members, in a certain way he monopolized the country, it was his rules the only ones that will pass and everyone had to do his way. People didn't want that anymore so the rebeled against it and although it might take them a while to recover, and the end all their sacrifices will be woth because nothing compares to living a in a democratic country.

Carlos Vazquez said...

Based on the idea that " not all rebellions end up in revolutions, but most revolutions start as rebellions ", concept expressed in the previous read article, I begin with my comment about the Libyan Revolution. Analyzing the early revolutions and political perspective, we can arrive at a conclusion that the government and its abuses, oppression, or bad exercise of their duties is a major factor influencing the emergence of these revolutions. The Libyan Revolution is not an exception in relativity to the topic. But with a difference, the evolution of this revolution did not assimilated the term of rebellion at all. I mean that we appreciated a minority of disasters that are usually caused by rebellionswhich determines or gives a high percentage of hope to the Libyan people as mentioned by the analyst Mansour O. El-Kikhi.

Anonymous said...

Libya’s rebellion was a unique event because is understandable that they had to resort in this extreme measure in order for their government and constitution to have a hope of ever being change. They reacted in a reasonable manner to their basic civil rights being constantly violated under Gaddafi’s rule. Despite of how hard is going to be for Libya to recover their economy and pull through from all the damages I think there is hope for this revolution because they deserve and have the right to overthrow Muammar Gaddafi because he is violating their right as human beings. It is incredible that Gaddafi did all the horrible and brutal punishments that resulted in countless deaths. I hope their courage it’s not in vane and they do get the opportunity to get to some sort of peace agreement and they can start a new life without all the punishments and by being mistreated by their “leader” Muammar Gaddafi.

Angie Paez